SLP filed by the Union of India before the Supreme Court challenging the judgment vide which the Madras High Court had allowed grant of GP of Rs 5400/- to ACP recipient Inspectors after 4 years was heard this morning. The Secretary General, AICEIA Advisor Shri Arun Zachariah, and the Asstt. Secretary General attended the hearing.
The Supreme Court prima facie observed that since Career Progression scheme has been brought in to grant relief to stagnating cadres, the Government’s case does not appear strong. However, the Assistant Solicitor General pleaded that the issue will have huge financial implications and requires detailed hearing. Thereupon Court granted leave but refused the Government’s plea to stay implementation of the subject Madras High Court judgment. The Appellant of Madras High Court Appeal is thus entitled to get the Benefit immediately.
6 comments:
Our comrades hav successfully conveyed the issue to the Hon'ble Supreme Court. We should be proudfull to hav such comrades.
Congratulations to all.
Is it possible for the Board to implement the judgment of High Court in a one off case without making it a policy?
excellent decision taken by the cbec board member for opening the ban on ICT. Now we will work with more efficiency in our language friendly region.shiv pujan kumar.tamilnadu central excise inspector.
Gr- pay 5400 issue - Sincere efforts of the Association is highly appreciated.
Mohd. Shahid, Varanasi
What will be the next course of action for others, other than the petitioner. Should we write to our respective admins to fix our pay in the grade of 5400 (i.e, those who have have completed 4 years after ACP). Please advise.
N.Pajankar, Supdt.
Exscellent efforts made by the petitioner as well as Association is highly appreciated. It is seen that the relief has been given to the petitioner as earlier given in the case of anomaly in ACP pay fixation of 1992 Inspector Batch. Once again, CBEC will issue a circular saying that the benefit of relief grantaed by the SC is applicable to appealent only as was given the case of 1992 Batch inspector. Whether each and every individuals should go to HC/SC & spent money/time for their legitimate rights?
Post a Comment