Friday, November 26, 2010

UPDATE ON ANOMALY COMMITTEE MEETING

Posted by Secretary General on 11/26/2010 01:39:00 PM with 13 comments
During the Anomaly Committee Meeting the following points in respect of Inspectors were taken up

i)                    Regarding fixation of Pay Band to Promotee Inspectors with respect to 7450 of pre-revised scale, it was argued from staff side that in some of the other departments the fixation was done w.r.t. scale of  7450(pre-revised). The Additional Revenue Secretary has asked for the documents and wished to go through the same. The discussion on the point remained inconclusive. It was assured to take up the issue in detail during next meeting.
ii)                   Regarding notional fixation of pay w.e.f. 1.1.96, it was decided that the issue is not an anomaly and assured to take up the same out side the Anomaly Committee.
Rest of the points could not be taken up due to lack of time and it was decided to take up all the points left inconclusive, again during the next meeting to be called within three weeks.          

13 comments:

Bal Krishan said...

As per my knowledge, in Delhi Commissionerate, the benfit of fixation of pay as per pre revised scale has lready ben granted. whether it is not granted in any other commissionerate.
B.K.Rakheja

chotu said...

If it is true, any one from Delhi commissionerate please upload pay fixation orders so that it can be followed up in other commissionerates

kedhar said...

It is requested that the office bears of AICEIA at New Delhi may please obtain a copy of Rs. 7450Pay fixation of Delhi Commissionerate and upload to the website for similar fixation in our Commissionrate.

sujan said...

we don't know from where these rumours come, I am from Delhi commissionerate and no fixation of pay as per pre revised payscale has been granted.
regards

gyanprakash said...

Assistants in prasar bharati and shipping minisrty have fixed @7450*1.86

rajaguru said...

What's happening? We should focus our attention to only one point agenda: we will not work as subordinates to the junior examiner of customs. We cannot get anything from the Board through representation. We should tell the Revenue Secretary that we lost faith in CBEC which is intended for the welfare of Examiners and Appraisers due to obvious reasons.

RAM said...

details of points discussed in the anamoly committee is detailed in the ministerial staff's Association. The SG may would like reproduce the same in the blogspot. Can visit http://aiccemof.blogspot.com/.

with regrets (not regards)

RAM said...

details of points discussed in the anamoly committee is detailed in the ministerial staff's Association blog. The SG may would like reproduce the same in the blogspot. Can visit http://aiccemof.blogspot.com/.

P.Vigneshwar Raju said...

Some of the Members have expressed doubts about granting of 5400 Grade Pay to ACP Inspectors and its effect on 3rd Financial Upgradation in view of the Govt. clarifying the NFG 5400 will be set off against one of the MACP. Under the circumstances the following points highlighted, for discussion of the cadre:

1. As per para 2 of MACP Scheme, the MACPS envisages merely placement in the immediate next higher grade pay in the hierarchy of the recommended revised pay bands and grade pay as given in Section 1 , Part-A of the first schedule of the CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008. Thus the scheme recommends immediate next higher grade pay and delinked the grade pay of promotional post. It means there is no connection between MACP and next promotional grade therefore, what ever the immediate next higher grade pay available has to be given on MACP irrespective of whether it is immediate promotional grade or otherwise. Analyzing these aspects, the following it can be construed as follows:

i) On appointment: 6500 or 4200 in PB-2
ii) On ACP after 12/10 years 7500 or 4800 PB-2
iii) After 4 years in 4800( ie 12/10+4=16/14 years) 5400 PB-2(we have to fight for the grade pay of 5400 in PB-3 as given to Section officers)
iv) On completion of 20 years 6600 PB-3(ie immediate next higher grade pay available in case NFG of 5400 is not counted as MACP)
v) On completion of 30 years 7700 in PB-3(ie. immediate next higher grade pay available.

The above analogy is made in view of the clarification dated 29.9.2010 given by the CBEC in consultation with DOPT where it was categorically stated that the NFG of 5400 in PB-2 granted after 4 years, as well as the grade pay of 5400 in PB-3 are to be treated as separate grade pays for the purpose of MACPS.(para 8.1 of MACPS). Clarifications being made by some of the offices that MACP is required to be given from PB-2 5400 to 5400 in PB-3 is not correct, as it can be treated as only seperate grade pay but not as immediate next higher grade pay.

The intention of creating 5400 in PB-2 by Pay Commission is only to upgrade the Group ‘B’ officers in 4800 after 4 years, and not as regular grade pay. It is only the Govt. which has changed it to PB-3 for some of the interested cadres.

Even as clarified by DOPT that the grade pay of 5400 given after 4 years is to be set off against one of the MACP, there is no loss to the cadre as you are going to get the grade pay after 16/14 years instead of 20 years with all the consequential benefits. Thereafter the next NFG(6600) has to be after 26/24 as stipulated in MACPS if not after 30 years as usual.

Therefore, there is only gain but not any loss under any circumstances to the cadre if NFG is granted to ACP Inspectors.

Shiwalik said...

Oh! at last AICEIA got fresh breeze by demanding GP7700 in PB3 after 30 years. Oh! God save us from these saviours of our cadre.Neither Sixth Pay Report proposed any GP7700 nor GOI/DOPT accepted any such Grade Pay till date.

RAM said...

It is learntt the the cadre restructure proposal in Income Tax DEpartment is apprived bt Secretary (Revenue) and file sent to IFU for their approval.

What is the fate in CBEC?

As a token of reward by IT department for completing 150 years, they are demanding free mobile hand sets.

Whether the office bearers of AICEIA will look after the welfare of their members at par with their counterpart in the same department - REVENUE?

RAM said...

It is learnt that the cadre restructure proposal in Income Tax DEpartment is apprived bt Secretary (Revenue) and file sent to IFU for their approval.

What is the fate in CBEC?

As a token of reward by IT department for completing 150 years, they are demanding free mobile hand sets.

Whether the office bearers of AICEIA will look after the welfare of their members at par with their counterpart in the same department - REVENUE?

insp said...

The Income Tax department has struck an estimated Rs 50 crore deal with BSNL to provide 51,000 mobile connections and one thousand high-end Blackberry phones for secure and fast communication amongst its officers and staff. A news item is published in Vizag Association website: www.inspvizag.org

I request AICEIA to put forward a demand for similar facility to our oficers.