Friday, September 10, 2010

No. 13018 /1/2010-Estt. (Leave)
Government of India
Minisby of Personnel, P.G. and Pensions
(Department of Personnel & Training)
New Delhi, the 7th September, 2010
Office Memorandum
Sub: Child Care Leave in respect of Central Government employees
as a result of Sixth Central Pay Commission recommendations -
Clarification regarding
The undersigned is directed to say that this Department has been receiving representations from Government Servants through various quarters like the Public Grievances CelVAssociations etc requesting to review the decision to allow Child Care Leave (CCL)
only if the employee has no E.L. at her credit.
2. This Department's O.M. No.13018/2/2008-Estt.(L) dated 11/09/2008 regarding introduction of Child Care Leave in respect of Central Government employees and subsequent clarifications vide O.Ms. dated 29/9/2008, 1811 112008 and 2/12/2008 were reviewed.
It has now been decided in consultation with Department of Expenditure, to delete the condition that CCL can be availed only if the employee concerned has no Earned Leave at her credit, subject to the following conditions:-
(i) CCL may not be granted in more than 3 spells in a calendar year.
(ii) CCL may not be granted for less than 15 days.
(iii) CCL should not ordinarily be granted during the probation
period except in case of certain extreme situations where the leave sanctioning authority is fully satisfied about the need of Child Care Leave to the probationer. It may also be ensured that the period for which this leave is sanctioned during probation is minimal.
3. It is reiterated that the leave is to be treated like Earned Leave and sanctioned as such.
4. These orders take effect from 1.9.2008. Earned Leave, if any, availed by women employees before availing CCL subsequent to the issue of the OM 13018/2/2008-Estt. (L) dated 18- 1 1-2008 may be adjusted against CCL, if so requested by the employee.
5. Hindi version will follow.
Director
All Ministriesmepartments of the Govt. of India, etc
(As per standard mailing lrsr).
F.No. 13018/1/2010-Lstt.(O New Delhi, the 7"' Seote~nber 2010
Copy also forwarded to:
I . All MinistrieslDepartme~lt of the Govl. of India.
2. Office orthe Co~nptroller& Auditor General of India.
3. Office of the Controller General of Accounts. Ministry of Financc.
4. Secretaries to Union Public Service Com~nissionISupre~nCe ourt of India/
Election Com~l~issionlLok Sabha Sectt./Rajya Sabha Sectt.1Cabinet
Sectt.1Central Vigilance CornmissionRresident's Sec1t.i Vice-President's;
Prirne Minister's OfficelPlanning Co~nlnission.
5. All State Governments and Union Territories.
6: Governors of all StatcslLt. Governors of all Union Territories.
7. Secretary. National Council of JCM (Staff Side), 13-C, Feroz Shah Road.
New Dellli.
8. All Members ol- Stafl' Side of the National Council of JCMlDepartr~~e~~tal
Council.
9. All Oflicel-s1Sectiuns of DOPTlDeptt. of Administrative Reforms & Public
Grievances/Depal.tment of Pensions & Pensioners WelfarelPESB
10. Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure
1 1 . Ot'ficial Language Wing (Legislative Deptt.). Bhagwan Dass lioad, New Delhi.
12. Railway Bmrd, New Delhi.
n. NIC, DOPI'.
14. 50 spare copies.

5 comments:

Singh said...

AICEIA Blog dated
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Great News
. Supreme Court allows inter application and directed our board to settle the inequities in promotion of the Superintendent of Central Excise to the Assistant Commissioner Grade and report within July 20, 2010.
Posted by AICEIA at 4:27 PM

CAN ANYBODY UPDATE ON THIS IMPORTANT ISSUE.

jitender said...

Have our reverred representative bothered to take the view of Board on the Calcutta High Court's judgment dated 27.8.2010 telephonically as requested by me repeatedly and cared to apprise the members of the outcome of the same. Are they afraid of talking to Chairman, CBEC on this issue. Moreover for what purpose the ASG was requesting judges to dispose off the case soon. When the judgement is out, it is now imperative and expedient on the part of SG to give the view point of the Board on the said judgement immediately or to step down and make way for any North Indian to hold the charge of association in an aggressive way.

rajesh said...

As per the MACP clarifications
"B) In the case of normal promotional hierarchy:
Date of appointment in entry Grade in the pre-revised pay scale of Rs.5500-9000: 01.10.1982
1st ACP granted on 09.08.1999 :
Rs.6500-10500 (pre-revised)
2nd ACP due on 01.10.2006 (as per the existing hierarchy) :
Rs.10000-15200 (pre-revised).

Therefore, 2nd ACP would be in PB-3 with Grade Pay of Rs.6600 (in terms of hierarchy available):

3rd financial upgradation under MACPS would be due on 01.10.2012 in the immediate next higher grade pay in the hierarchy of recommended revised pay band and grade pay of Rs.7600."
Applying to our department, Inspectors appointed in 1993 got ACP in 2005 and grade pay of Rs. 4800 on 1.1.06. As per new rules they should be getting Grade Pay of Rs. 5400 in 2013(20years). Even if they get promoted just now, they will be getting grade pay of rs. 5400/- only after 4 years i.e only in 2014. Why this loss of One year.
Please clarify the same or take up this anomaly with the Board.

Rajesh(on deputation to DRI).

Singh said...

Conflicts arise

1982 Insp
2nd ACP PB3 GP 6600 (after 24 years)
3rd ACP PB3 GP 7600

1993 Insp (at present)
2nd ACP PB2 GP 5400 (after 20 years i.e. 2013)
3rd ACP PB3 GP 6600

However, rules must be same for same set of employees.

Therefore, for 1993 Insp.s, the situation should be like this:
2nd ACP PB3 GP 6600 (in year 2013)
3rd ACP PB3 GP 7600 (in year 2023)

The process of refixation of pay of Insps upto 1990 batch must start on this MACP clarification. The instructions on grant of 5400 grade pay after 4 year regular service in the grade of Supdt seems to have become obsolete.

Desikadasan said...

Best Wishes for Happy Ganesh Chathurthi!