MOST OF THE OFFICERS MAY NOT BE KNOWING THE DETAILS OF THE SUPREME COURT CASE WHICH HAS SAID TO HAVE COME IN OUR FAVOUR.
HERE ARE THE DETAILS OF THE CASE. SOONER THE ORDER COPY IS AVAILABLE IT WILL BE POSTED ON THIS BLOG FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL.
CIVIL APPEAL: 1198 OF 2005
PET.& RES.: R.S.PODDAR & ORS Vs. UNION OF INDIA& ORS.
PET. ADV. MR.PARAMANANDA GOUR
RES. ADV. MR. LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH
SUBJECT: SERVICE MATTERS-PROMOTION
APPEAL AGAINST: WP 1324/02 OF HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HERE ARE THE DETAILS OF THE CASE. SOONER THE ORDER COPY IS AVAILABLE IT WILL BE POSTED ON THIS BLOG FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL.
CIVIL APPEAL: 1198 OF 2005
PET.& RES.: R.S.PODDAR & ORS Vs. UNION OF INDIA& ORS.
PET. ADV. MR.PARAMANANDA GOUR
RES. ADV. MR. LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH
SUBJECT: SERVICE MATTERS-PROMOTION
APPEAL AGAINST: WP 1324/02 OF HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
4 comments:
not only the order copy it will be useful to have a team dissect the order and try to figure out how many vacancies would come to each cadre right from 1997 which would be beneficial to a lot of uninitiated officers.
ramesh.r.
true, it would be useful to know the vacancy positions in all zones
please give out the zone-wise vacancy positions also, if it is feasible
There is a mistake in the name of the petiotioner, It has been mentioned wrong , it is POTDAR and not PODDAR
Post a Comment