COMMENTS ON SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT IN W.P.NO.1198/2005 RATIO CASE

SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT IN W.P.NO.1198/2005 RATIO CASE

SC Order in W.P.1198-2005

Detail of the Supreme court case

MOST OF THE OFFICERS MAY NOT BE KNOWING THE DETAILS OF THE SUPREME COURT CASE WHICH HAS SAID TO HAVE COME IN OUR FAVOUR. 
HERE ARE THE DETAILS OF THE CASE. SOONER THE ORDER COPY IS AVAILABLE IT WILL BE POSTED ON THIS BLOG FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL. 


CIVIL APPEAL: 1198 OF 2005
PET.& RES.: R.S.PODDAR & ORS Vs. UNION OF INDIA& ORS.
PET. ADV. MR.PARAMANANDA GOUR
RES. ADV. MR. LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH
SUBJECT: SERVICE MATTERS-PROMOTION
APPEAL AGAINST: WP 1324/02 OF HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY

!!CHEERS!!

TO DAY IN A HISTORICAL JUDGEMENT THE APEX COURT HAS DECIDED THAT PARITY IN PROMOTION TO GR-A , POSTS MUST BE MAINTAINED SINCE 1997. RATIO MUST BE INCREAESD SINCE 1997 . we have not yet received the detail judgement there is a chance of  CONSULTATION WITH ASSOCIATION before implementation of the order.. 

:Nagpur application for affiliation:

CONGRATULATION TO COMRADE K.V.SRINIWAS FOR HIS PROMOTION AS SUPERINTENDENT

All India Central Excise Inspectors' Association like to congratulate Comrade K.V.Sriniwas for his promotion to the grade of Superintendent. Comrade Sriniwas former Secretary General of AIFCEEO bestowed his service for the cadre of Inspector of Central Excise for a considerable period of time, we wish all the best in his life and in his new post.

On inter Commissionerate Transfer issue, Board has sent the file to Law Ministry, only after having an instruction from Law ministry Board will be able o proceed further. Our team is constantly persuading the issue .

On the 5400 GP case.We have instructed the lawyer to file a fresh caveat prior to the expiry of the caveat petition we have already filed. The lawyer has done the same and send the copy of the caveat for our records. 

He has confirmed that the department has filed the petition on 24.06.2011 and the SLP has been assigned a dairy no. . However, the registry has returned the SLP after noting the following defects. " AN AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONER IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITION/APPEAL/APPLICATION HAS NOT BEEN FILED, PROPERLY ATTESTED AND IDENTIFIED." 

The department has 28 days to represent the SLP after curing the defects. Apparently that time is already over. Now they would have to get the delay in representing the SLP condoned before the SLP is listed before a bench for condoning delay in appeal and admission. Once the represented SLP is accepted by the registry our lawyer would be getting the copy and we would be having roughly two weeks from then to engage a senior counsel to oppose the admission. We expect this in this month.